AR2021-Research as a Catalyst for Organizational Transformation (Robin Beers, Wells Fargo)

—> Excited to be hear to talk about organizational transformation and role researchers can play



-
It’s an interconnected and interdependent worldview



-
How we approach problems in orgs is very mechanistic

-
Shareholder value as primary value businesses needed to focus on
-
But this has been changing in recent years

-
Previous principles were rooted in shareholder primacy
-
The members came together in 2019 to radically redefine what they thought what a corporation was
-
A shift from shareholder to stakeholder capitalism
-
Many CEOs signed agreement including Wells Fargo
-
Marc Benioff of Salesforce said business is about improving state of world
-
Larry Fink of BlackRock said that businesses must make positive benefit to society and benefit all stakeholders

-
We all need these powers to navigate a VUCA world

-
Learning: What data tells us
-
Connecting: Making meaning from the data and conversations across functional areas
-
Generating: What we will do with our new insights

-
We up level the entire org, by making everyone learn
-
Capabilities all people need to cultivate today

-
Came up with turning research lens onto the organization itself.
-
To help us and org see reality out there, and whether it’s in alignment with our internal assumptions and business objectives

-
This is not how organizations are typically reflected
-
They are sliced into departments line of business, and product areas

-
People will come up to me after research workshops and they’ll say it was fantastic to talk to each other, and see their perspective

-
Since we are asking business to consider customer experience in concert with internal assumptions and decision making processes, makes the work truly powerful

—> Now what? Let’s start grappling with what this all means and what’s in and out of alignment

-
Coined frame of “Experiential Significance”
-
Example includes understanding the importance of how race impacts how people interact with healthcare system
-
It also gives us cool term similar to terms quantitative researchers use

-
We all have experienced the feeling of studying one thing, and discovering a host of issues outside the work
-
We need to ask how organizations are designed

-
Can be studying something that calls org to re-examine where it stands on any point of org structure, such as:
-
Strategy
-
Structure
-
Pressures
-
Rewards
-
People
-

-
What do we need to do to capture competitive advantage

-
At the time, the business focused on budgeting tools for people in response to tools like Mint, and other fin-tech tools
-
Online banking helped facilitated this tracking

—> Now let’s talk about structure, or where location of design making power is

-
Mental model of competitors was radically different, i.e. just sign-up and start using the service
-
They did research with all kinds of small businesses
-
Came in and had sense making session and multi-functional group of folks, including Underwriting
-
This caused them to ask lots of questions during the application process
-
Few curious partners in the organization

—> Next, let’s talk about process: the flow of information and how it’s supported by the business

-
Research with team members and Wells Fargo employees
-
Pointed out that digitization of bad process would be insufficient, and that we needed to redesign process holistically

-
Wells Fargo Sales Scandal is example of this, where customers received Wells Fargo products they didn’t want or even knew that they had

-
Very political project, and external insights clashed with internal mental models
-
We were barred from changing incentives or how branches worked
-
Meanwhile, customers thought of Wells Fargo as just their bank, not a sales center
-
We were scared to challenge sales vs. service view of the world, and had to grapple with people’s mindsets before people could embrace findings

-
But senior folks commissioning study kept saying findings should be more actionable
-
We realized business people were not interested in engaging with the issues raised by sales/service schism



-
Why we exist?
-
Who we include?
-
Are we benefiting all stakeholders?
-
Are we harming some?

-
When you are uncovering things in research that are directly against the company’s cultural norms or effigies, how did you contextualize findings to avoid tripping reflexive responses??
-
Ask for all stakeholders to be in session where they explicitly state their assumptions about what they think is true
-
Have it documented
-
If we hear something out of alignment with assumptions, we can do comparison of what we see/what we belive
-
I’m curious how Wells Fargo signing the agreement to promote an economy for all Americans changed and trickled down to the day to day culture (if at all).
-
On Enterprise council working to put action plans in place, workforce outcomes and recruiting
-
Advocacy and creating culture of belonging
-
So it is a start/stop pattern