{"id":182620,"date":"2014-06-16T14:09:57","date_gmt":"2014-06-16T14:09:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/staging.rm.gfolkdev.net\/?p=182620"},"modified":"2022-09-21T17:48:33","modified_gmt":"2022-09-21T17:48:33","slug":"an-unanswerable-survey-invitation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rosenfeldmedia.com\/an-unanswerable-survey-invitation\/","title":{"rendered":"An unanswerable survey invitation"},"content":{"rendered":"
“Choose a single question and get it in front of some users” – that’s what I wrote myself in my aims for this book.<\/p>\n
Evernote recently send me an email that corresponds to that advice. The single question was:<\/p>\n
“How would you rate the support you received?”<\/p>\n
And it’s made me revise my advice. Being a single question isn’t quite good enough. It’s got to be a good question – one that users:<\/p>\n
My problem with Evernote’s question? Let’s run through those steps:<\/p>\n
It offered me two choices: “Bad, I’m unsatisfied” and “Good, I’m satisfied”. Neither works. The support agent wasn’t good: it took several emails for him to understand that I didn’t understand the lack of the feature. But he wasn’t bad either: we did get there in the end. And I’m both unsatisfied with the lack of the feature, and\u00a0satisfied with other aspects of Evernote.<\/p>\n
(Although I’m not exactly thrilled that they have addressed me by my name in lower case with a 3-digit number of their choice added to the end. That seems disrespectful).<\/p>\n
So sorry, Evernote, no click from me. But thanks for the opportunity to think through one aspect of my book.<\/p>\n